Anti-Space Weaponry Act of 2020
-
I have a few amendments, so I thank the Speaker for the time extension.
Amendment 1:
SECTION I. DEFINITIONS
I. Weapons.are defined as any element or object that is intentionally designed to, and with the express purpose tocanharm or cause destruction to either persons or property.
II. Celestial Body.is defined as any natural body outside of the Earth's atmosphere.
III. Spacecraft.is definedas any man-made body capable and meant to reach space and escape the earth's gravity.a man-made body, which may be manned or unmanned, designed to operate past an attitulde of 100 kilometres above Earth.Amendment 2:
SECTION II. REGULATIONS
I.
Whereas, anyAny nation with or without a space program may not install any armed spacecraft or weaponry in orbit around Earth, the moon, or any other celestial body.
II.Whereas, theThe moon and other celestial bodies shall be used by all member-states exclusively for peaceful purposes.
III.Whereas, theThe establishment of military bases, installations and fortifications, the testing of any type of weapons , except as allowed by European law, and the conduct of military manoeuvres on celestial bodies shall be forbidden.
IV.Whereas, theThe use of military personnel for scientific research or for any other peaceful purposes shall not be prohibited.
V.Whereas, theThe use of any equipment or facility necessary for peaceful exploration of the moon and other celestial bodies shall also not be prohibited.
VI. Whereas, any object or substance containing highly explosive or nuclear material are prohibited from being sent to space.Amendment 3
Section III: Enforcement
I. All member states of the European Union are required to harmonize their national law(s) with this Act in
512 months of time from its approval by the European Council.
II.Whereas, allMember-states of the European Union with a deployed armed spacecraft or weaponry in space are required todetonate/return them to earth within 3 months after this act is passed is approved in the European Council.develop a plan to either dearm, safely orbit, or decommission in some capacity all spacecraft prhobited by this act within twelve months. This plan shall be submitted to the Director of the ESA, but shall not require the explicit approval of the ESA Director. European Union member-states shall have five years to comply with the removal of all prohibited spacecraft, the use of any prohibited spacecraft in the meantime shall be considered a punishable offense.
III. Breaches of this Act shall be considered a punishable offense in member states. Failure of member states to enforce this Act may be tried in the European Court of Justice. -
As I believe that Coun. Falk had proposed better Amendments than mine, I hereby ask to withdraw my amendments.
Friedrich van Allen
Councilor, Kingdom of Reitzmag -
Again another hypocrite move from Reitzmag, as we are used to see in this Council coming from Councillor van Allen. Councillor Barrington said that in another way, but yeah, absolutely he used the right words for this. When you see Reitzmag saying peace is the only solution to this, they could be developing a new treaty with the UNSR or other unrecognised countries that were stablished by Coup d'Etats or revolutions. But I find, as always, some victimhood in Reitzmag and even I'm very used to these kind of attitudes, so, it doesn't surprise me.
This remembers me to the last Commission campaign where Atty. Winston wanted to intervene all of our armies to remove nuclear stuff and things like that, as also doing joint exercises because, as we all know, joint military exercises are the most important priority for the European Union, we don't have any other challenges but the military! I think that if somes really believe this, they have been isolated from the EU during these months. Military is an important thing, of course. But please, let's moderate ourselves on this, we have lots of much important challenges.
I would like to clarify that I'm against any type of space battle, but I can't stand this. Again, if we don't want to be forced of free movement, why would we force countries to de-weaponize the space or just have none of Space Weaponary? I kind of know why this Act has appeared: Because the UNSR launched a missile to a Reitzmic Space Station, so then, we all need to avoid Space Weaponary. But suddenly, we all see how the Reitzmic Government returns money to the UNSR, and we et to know all the hidden steps of the matter, what really made us reach this point.
I will possibly vote against this, just because it will not stop those nations that do not accomplish the European Union regulation, and I see it just another attempt to regulate something Reitzmag suffered because if Reitzmag suffers, we all need to do exactly the same what Reitzmag says, or that is what Councillor van Allen might think.
Donald D. Tusk
Councillor for Spain -
Mr. Tusk, are you telling me that you want to destroy the EU? You want to develop space-borne weapons to do what? Attack or scare anyone you hate? Do you really not want peace and unity and spare the lives of the future Europeans who would cherish our successes in Space? The illegitimate government in Icholasen is the biggest threat to us all. If they had done it to us in Reitzmag, they can do it to all of the member-states! And we can prevent that if we pass this act Mr. Tusk.
Friedrich van Allen
Councilor, Kingdom of Reitzmag -
Do you really think I'm aiming to destroy the European Union? My god, this is harder than I first thought Cllr. van Allen, and your arguments are just 2 if we don't want to support your proposals: "Do you want to deprieve my country?" or "Do you want to destroy the EU?" It seems that if someone goes against one of your proposals, then "he has to go to hell, there's no way someone can go against me, technically impossible."
And about the Union of Nicoleizian Soviet Republic, mostly known as UNSR, I'm going to say something that has been proven in the past and will always be like that: Rogue states never accomplish the law, and they will never do that. So, passing this to avoid rogue nations to attack us is as silly as saying that we are controlled by someone and we are jailed on a videogame. I'm going against this act, and even if I'm against war, I see this as a silly thing, because it changes nothing. At least, Cllr. Falk has proposed some amendments that make this much better, but still, I'm opposed to this.
Donald D. Tusk
Councillor for Spain -
Debate has now closed. It is time to vote on amendments. Voting on amendments begins NOW and will last until 09:00 GMT on August 16th, 2020.
There are three amendments, all of which are authored by Councillor Falk:
Amendment I
SECTION I. DEFINITIONS
I. Weapons.are defined as any element or object that is intentionally designed to, and with the express purpose tocanharm or cause destruction to either persons or property.
II. Celestial Body.is defined as any natural body outside of the Earth's atmosphere.
III. Spacecraft.is definedas any man-made body capable and meant to reach space and escape the earth's gravity.a man-made body, which may be manned or unmanned, designed to operate past an altitude of 100 kilometres above Earth.Amendment II
SECTION II. REGULATIONS
I.Whereas, anyAny nation with or without a space program may not install any armed spacecraft or weaponry in orbit around Earth, the moon, or any other celestial body.
II.Whereas, theThe moon and other celestial bodies shall be used by all member-states exclusively for peaceful purposes.
III.Whereas, theThe establishment of military bases, installations and fortifications, the testing of any type of weapons , except as allowed by European law, and the conduct of military manoeuvres on celestial bodies shall be forbidden.
IV.Whereas, theThe use of military personnel for scientific research or for any other peaceful purposes shall not be prohibited.
V.Whereas, theThe use of any equipment or facility necessary for peaceful exploration of the moon and other celestial bodies shall also not be prohibited.
VI. Whereas, any object or substance containing highly explosive or nuclear material are prohibited from being sent to space.Amendment III
Section III: Enforcement
I. All member states of the European Union are required to harmonize their national law(s) with this Act in512 months of time from its approval by the European Council.
II.Whereas, allMember-states of the European Union with a deployed armed spacecraft or weaponry in space are required todetonate/return them to earth within 3 months after this act is passed is approved in the European Council.develop a plan to either dearm, safely orbit, or decommission in some capacity all spacecraft prhobited by this act within twelve months. This plan shall be submitted to the Director of the ESA, but shall not require the explicit approval of the ESA Director. European Union member-states shall have five years to comply with the removal of all prohibited spacecraft, the use of any prohibited spacecraft in the meantime shall be considered a punishable offense.
III. Breaches of this Act shall be considered a punishable offense in member states. Failure of member states to enforce this Act may be tried in the European Court of Justice.
I vote FOR all amendments.
Edward Firoux
Council Speaker and Councillor for Inquista -
I vote FOR all amendments.
Friedrich van Allen
Councilor, Kingdom of Reitzmag -
On behalf of the Kingdom of Spain, I vote FOR all amendments.
Donald D. Tusk
Councillor for Spain -
I vote FOR all amendments.
Charles Michel
Councillor for the Kingdom of Fremet -
On behalf of the Kingdom of Montenbourg, I vote FOR all amendments.
Emma Granger
Councillor for Montenbourg -
On behalf of the Republic of Nofoaga, I ABSTAIN for all amendments.
Mrs. Azaya Dubecq
EU Councilor for the Republic of Nofoaga -
On behalf of the United Kingdoms of Mennrimiak, I vote AGANIST this amendment.
Adam Karlssen
Councillor for Mennrimiak -
With 5 votes for and 1 vote against all amendments, all three amendments have PASSED.
The legislation has been updated to reflect the passed amendments.
Final voting begins NOW and will last until 20:45 GMT on August 19th, 2020.
On behalf of the Most Blessed State of Inquista, I vote AGAINST this act.
Edward Firoux
Council Speaker and Councillor for Inquista -
On behalf of the Kingdom of Spain, I vote AGAINST this act.
Donald D. Tusk
Councillor for Spain -
On behalf of the Republic of Nofoaga, I ABSTAIN from voting on this act.
Mrs. Azaya Dubecq
EU Councilor for the Republic of Nofoaga -
On behalf of the Archrepublic of Vayianod, I ABSTAIN on this act.
Carita Falk
Archrepublic of Vayinaod -
On behalf of the Kingdom of Reitzmag, I vote FOR this act.
Friedrich van Allen
Councilor, Kingdom of Reitzmag -
On behalf of the United Kingdoms of Mennrimiak, I vote AGANIST this act.
Adam Karlssen
Councillor for Mennrimiak -
The Empire of Inimicus votes AGAINST this Act.
Sir Augustus Barrington
Empire of Inimicus -
On behalf of the Kingdoms of Montenbourg, I vote FOR this act.
Emma Granger
Councillor for Montenbourg
The Kingdom of Spain
