Amendment to the European and Accountable Council Act 2020
-
Cllr. Hook, I don't understand this amendment, nor its real purpose. We need new nations to proof how democratic they are when they joined the European Union. Back in summer, a nation which today is out of the European Union, Noctoria, joined our Union. They were a dictatorship, no elections, no freedom of press, nor of speech. Myself, as an European who comes from a democratic country as Spain, can't allow these countries to avert satisfying the minimum democratic standards written in our Constitution. The European Union needs to give back autonomy to member states, of course, but it can't cease on its aim to achieve a democratic society in our region. And I won't be part of that cease try.
Donald Tusk
Deputy Speaker and Councillor for Spain -
The purpose is to give sovreignty to a nation in how they elect a councillour. What difference does it make if the election is popular vote or being elected by democratically elected members. Either way citizens have input in the selection or can punish parties if they put a bad councillour in power.
Skye Hook
Deputy Councillour for United Duchies -
Ammmendment proposal 2:
SECTION I. DEMOCRATIZATION OF THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL
I. All members of the European Council, also known as Councillors, shall be directly and democratically elected or confirmed by an elected body or bodies to achieve office.These shall be held within 4 months of joining.
II. The governments of European Union member states may not appoint or dismiss their Councillor without following an official democratic process outlined in this Act. if they accomplish with the following prerequisite mentioned in this Act.SECTION II. PREREQUISITE TO AVOID COUNCILLOR ELECTION
I. Member states willing to avert councillor elections shall have stayed in the European Union for at least 12 months. -
Councillor, I think you are not understanding the matter correctly, and that's something which also happened to my friend Cllr. Mizrachi-Roscoe to whom I wish a speedy recovery. What you have just proposed in your first amendment is literally a clearance for dictatorships to designate a Councillor without listening to their citizens. The European Union, we as Councillors can't allow dictatorship or undemocratic states to have a go on not listening to the people. What would the European Union be then? Our values, common values are simple: equality, democracy, freedom, solidarity, empathy. We shan't betray those values, and I ask Councillors to vote against Cllr. Hook's amendments.
Furthermore, this does not just betray our values. The second amendment is pointless, and again, gives clearance to undemocratic states to avoid going through this very uncomfortable process for them. While they join and prepare everything, 4 months can easily pass and oh wait, they wouldn't need to hold them. That would be a total disaster for the European Union and giving freedom to those that doesn't. And that is something we, as democrats, can't allow to happen in our region.
Donald Tusk
Deputy Speaker and Councillor for Spain -
With all due respect Cllr.Tusk I think you are misunderstanding the two ammendments together would still require an election or confirmation vote by elected legislators. This way indirect democracy is allowed while stopping pure appointments. The way your ammendment is written we would still be forcing new nations to go EU's way or the high way like Alkharya had to. This could put off european nations from joining as they have to change the way they elect officials. The EU should not be forcing its version of democracy on a nation.
Skye Hook
-
Debate is now over. It is time to vote on amendments. Voting on amendments will last until 22:16 GMT on March 11th, 2021.
There are two amendments, both proposed by Deputy Councillor Hook:
Amendment I - Proposed by Deputy Cllr. Hook
SECTION III. COUNCILLOR ELECTION PROCESSES
I. Councillors from new member states may only take their office within the European Council after satisfying a democratic processes in which all following conditions are met:
a) An election by popular vote of the people or by a democratically elected legislature or legislatures has took place.
b) The electorate directly voted for Councillor candidates on their ballot(s);
c) Suffrage was universal and equal to all citizens that were of the legal voting age;
b) The election process was generally seen as free and fair;
c) Candidates for Councillor were able to freely nominate themselves;
d) They successfully received the most votes at the end of the official voting process.
II. New member states shall be responsible for organizing, monitoring and fulfilling their own Councillor elections. New member states shall also be allowed to freely design and implement their own democratic procedures, rules and processes for electing their Councillor as long as all conditions for choosing a successful Councillor in Clause I of this Section are met.
III. Councillor elections must be regular and must occur at least once every four years.
IV. It is encouraged that member states elect their Councillor one month after they elect their national legislatures, or they elect their Councillor during the official European Council Election period.Amendment II - Proposed by Deputy Cllr. Hook
SECTION I. DEMOCRATIZATION OF THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL
I. The governments of European Union member states may not appoint or dismiss their Councillor if they accomplish with the following prerequisite mentioned in this Act.SECTION II. PREREQUISITE TO AVOID COUNCILLOR ELECTION
I. Member states willing to avert councillor elections shall have stayed in the European Union for at least 12 months.
I vote AGAINST both amendments.
Donald Tusk
Deputy Speaker and Councillor for Spain -
On behalf of the Commonwealth of Leagio, I vote AGAINST both amendments.
Francis Plessis
EU Councilor for Leagio -
On behalf of United Duchies I vote for both ammendments
Skye Hook , Deputy Councillour for United Duchies -
The Empire of Inimicus votes FOR both amendments.
Interim Cllr Nicholas Benfield
-
On behalf of the Realm of Great Ruthund, I vote FOR both Amendments.
Tony Odhinazen
EU Councilor, Ruthund -
I vote AGAINST both amendments.
Emma Granger
Councillor for Montenbourg -
On behalf of the Republic of Nofoaga, I vote AGAINST both amendments.
Mrs. Paul-Gabrielle Muzhare
EU-Councillor for the Republic of Nofoaga -
Voting on amendments has now concluded.
With 3 votes FOR and 4 votes AGAINST, Amendments I and II have FAILED.
Final voting begins NOW and will last until 22:16 GMT on March 14th, 2021.
On behalf of the Kingdom of Spain, I vote FOR this amendment.
Donald Tusk
Deputy Speaker and Councillor for Spain -
On behalf of United Duchies I vote for the this ammendment
Skye Hook , Deputy Councillour for United Duchies -
Without Cllr Hook's amendments, the Empire of Inimicus sees no choice but to vote AGAINST this amendment.
Cllr Nicholas Benfield
-
On behalf of the Realm of Great Ruthund, I vote AGAINST this amendment.
Tony Odhinazen
EU Councilor, Ruthund -
On behalf of the Alkharyan Republic, I vote FOR this amendment.
Metin Fazlı
European Councillor of the Alkharyan Republic -
On behalf of the Commonwealth of Leagio, I vote FOR this amendment.
Francis Plessis
EU Councilor for Leagio -
On behalf of the United Kingdoms of Mennrimiak, I vote AGAINST this amendment.
Karl Henderssen
Interim Councillor for Mennrimiak -
Voting has now concluded. With 4 votes FOR and 3 votes AGAINST, this amendment has PASSED.
Donald Tusk
Deputy Speaker and Councillor for Spain
The Kingdom of Spain
